Labels: currently proposed FDA guideline for new supplements would eliminate access to many protective supplements, currently proposed FDA guideline for new supplements would jump health care costs MORE
Tuesday, August 30, 2016
FDA threatens access to
effective supplements…
Today's Post: Tuesday, 8-30-2016
I. In
1994, a law was passed, called DSHEA, that guaranteed the public access to
supplements mostly consisting of vitamins and minerals and food and herbal
extracts and a few other beneficial substances found in foods or herbs.
Since 1994 the supplement industry has found
another 60 or so such substances that have health benefits – very important
health benefits in some cases.
Because of the food ingredient base of these
supplements, with few exceptions these supplements have had a sterling safety
record.
(All of them combined have a much
better safety record than aspirin by itself!)
Now, with many thousands of users for years
they have ALREADY had much more thorough and varied testing than any drug goes
through.
And, it’s not even close. These supplements have had more people using
them but all of the very largest drug testing programs can afford to study.
The hundreds of thousands of people who
prevent heart attacks and strokes and osteoarthritis and relieve pain more
safely than drugs in some cases -- and more -- by taking these supplements are
getting benefits and health protection they cannot get from drugs.
So depriving these people of those
supplements and that protection would certainly harm them.
But there is an even bigger issue than just
harming individuals at stake.
Because of this protection from disease of
hundreds of thousands of people, the millions of dollars that they would
otherwise have had to pay or burden taxpayers with for less effective medical
care have NOT happened.
Because of the high costs of the harmful and
fattening foods and drinks the average American has been consuming and the few
people who get the exercise they need and smoking --
AND the baby boom generation cascading into
the over 65 years when they are most likely to need medical care, we are
already facing continuous increases in health care costs.
This is already so much the case it is
harming our economy!
It would be a disaster for this to get even
worse in amounts this large.
Now the drug companies want to have the FDA
remove the public access to these 60 supplements so that they can make patented
versions they can sell decades in the future.
This ensures their monopoly and makes them
undeserved money.
But it removes safe and effective supplements
from the public and just at this time when boosting health care costs more
would be criminal negligence to do.
Now the FDA has finalized a “Guidance” that
enables them to do exactly that!
It’s not needed to protect the public. And the harm it would do individuals and our
economy with this added increase in health care costs simply cannot be
tolerated.
So this guidance must simply not be allowed
to go forward.
II. But in addition to that, this problem
exists in the first place because of a structural defect in the current FDA and
how it’s funded.
The FDA is an important federal agency that
is supposed to regulate food, and drugs, and supplements.
But it is badly underfunded. So much so that
their real source of income is the testing fees for drugs.
So in practice, the FDA has become mostly an
agency of the drug company’s interests with Federal authority to regulate.
This means that it tends to do a poor job in
regulating all three things.
They haven’t enough money to do effective and
win-win regulation of ethical food providers and supplement companies.
And, they have been too willing to approve
drugs that are not effective or only partly effective which have bad and occasionally
fatal side effects.
The drug companies are their main source of
income. So the FDA tends to do what
those companies want them to do.
Unfortunately this often means the FDA acts
in ways that harm the public interest and give the drug companies undeserved money.
The bad news is that the FDA needs far more
funding from the US government; AND it needs three separate parts that are
funded and managed separately:
One for drugs; one for food; and one for
supplements!
Since the better doctors and pharmacists tend
to know which of the older drugs are safe and at least somewhat effective, the
public is somewhat protected against this system.
But the regulation of the supplements for
weight loss and muscle building and youth restoration that are not effective –
or much worse contain drugs NOT listed on the label -- the FDA already has
the authority to regulate and prevent the worst of these things.
They aren’t funded for it and don’t do much
of it.
They do not need to hand the safe and effective
supplements that do exist over to the drug company monopoly to do this job.
They just need more funding and separate
management that ensures they do well what they already have the authority to
do.
If the part of the FDA that regulates
supplements was separate and adequately funded, they might actually do this
that they don’t do much of now.
And, since this part of the FDA would NOT be
paid by the drug companies, the FDA would NOT be trying to rip off the
supplement companies and the public interest to the sole benefit of monopoly
drug companies as it is now doing!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home