Labels: more bad news about statins, protect your heart, safe and effective ways to lower LDL, why working on the known causes of heart disease is both far safer and far more effective than taking statins
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
More bad
news about statins....
Today's
Post: Wednesday, 9-12-2012
1. The recent bad news first. On August 29 this year Reuters Health sent
out a health article about research done at the Phoenix VA Health Care
System. Their Dr. Aramesh Saremi spoke
about the research to the Reuters Health interviewer.
In this study, type
2 diabetics with frequent statin use had greater progression of coronary artery
calcification than people who took less statins or none.
Dr Saremi said
this: "Our study shows for the first time that statins actually appear to
promote calcification in patients with longstanding type 2 diabetes, despite
optimal lipid levels and regardless of prior heart and vascular disease,"
The article also
added that earlier studies of nondiabetic people taking statins found no
slowing in the calcification of plaque in coronary arteries.
One of the comments
about this article said this might mean that the calcification would stabilize
the plaque and make the sudden clots from plaque breaking off that cause heart
attacks.
Given the huge
number of people generally and the number of people with type 2 diabetes who
now take statins, it would be nice it this was so.
The data so far do
NOT support this hopeful idea. Despite
lowering LDL cholesterol and preventing a small number of heart attacks—from
less than 1 to a bit over 3 heart attacks in 100 people taking statins, so far
there is ZERO reduction in the death rate for people taking statins.
(People who do
lifestyle upgrades that prevent heart disease and its causes and take niacin DO
have a reduction in death rates and virtually none of the side effects of
statins.)
This calcification
side effect of statins and others apparently cancel out any good done with
their small prevention rate for heart attacks.
There are 3 grave
problems with calcification of plaque. A
CAT scan showing a lot of calcification is very highly predictive of future
heart attacks and related problems. So
that data suggests this side effect directly cancels out any benefit of statins
when type 2 diabetics take them.
Second, part of the
problem with heart attacks is that there is a sudden clot. But the harm is done when it gets stuck and
blocks blood flow.
Calcification of
plaque both narrows the opening the clot needs to pass through to avoid this
and makes the blood vessel wall far less resilient which means the clot is less
able to push its way through.
Lastly, added
calcification of the blood vessels helps cause high blood pressure which helps
cause heart disease. Worse, the drugs
for high blood pressure are often not enough to lower this kind of blood
pressure and themselves have side effects lowering the quality of life for the
people who take them or even cause other diseases.
2. Another recent study found that the harm done
to people who exercise vigorously enough to help prevent heart disease and type
2 diabetes or turn them down is far greater when they take the stronger statins
or larger doses of statins.
This is nuts! That means that, with statins, people need to
chose between less LDL lowering from taking statins and the more effective use
of exercise to prevent both type 2 diabetes and heart disease. The exercise also slows aging, protects your
brain, and does lower death rates!
3. The truly horrible thing is that lowering
high LDL IS protective to your heart. So if you can do it safely and without
excessive side effects, it IS a good idea.
That happens in two
ways.
a) Small particle
LDL is literally so small it sticks into the chinks in the molecular wall of
your blood vessels and begins plaque build up.
Think pouring fine sand into an engine.
Some of this may happen directly and some apparently happens because the
minor damage and inflammation from this causes your body to add more patching to
cover over the damage.
The most effective
and protective ways to lower this kind of LDL, however are NOT statin
drugs. The two categories that both
lower it and are quite heart protective are to STOP doing things that cause
more small particle LDL and start doing the things that lower small particle
LDL.
Eating hydrogenated
oils at all increases your level of small particle LDL. The safe amount of this stuff to eat is
basically zero NOT just eating somewhat less.
Research has found ingesting hydrogenated oils increases your level of
small particle LDL. Worse, when you eat
hydrogenated oils it takes your body more than a month to clear half of it from
your system. And that means that if you
eat a little most days of every week, after a few weeks your small particle LDL
is boosted every single day. So stop
eating things like shortening and margarine that are made out of hydrogenated
oils. Always read labels and stop eating anything with either more listed grams
of trans fats than zero AND stop eating anything with ANY hydrogenated oils
listed as an ingredient. (Due to
lobbying, foods can have up to 0.5 grams of trans fats per serving and SAY they
have zero. But if the serving sizes are
smaller than what people actually eat, if they don’t also delete foods with
hydrogenated oils on the ingredient list, they can actually eat several grams
of trans fats even though the label lists “zero!”
Since hydrogenated
oils are cheap and increase shelf life, hundreds of foods still have them. So you have to work at eating things like raw
vegetables that have no oils and always reading labels and slashing the kinds
of foods in which often have hydrogenated oils such as cookies, chips, most
other store bought baked goods, and French fries, and any packaged foods.
(Doing this does
have the extra benefit of helping you be less fat.)
Exposure to tobacco
smoke is directly proven to cause plaque build up. And it lowers your HDL cholesterol that helps
prevent plaque build up. So it looks
likely that tobacco smoke both increases
small particle LDL and oxidizes it making the excess patching more
likely.
Doing regular
moderate and vigorous exercise most days of every week not only increases HDL
and lowers triglycerides it’s been directly tested to lower small particle LDL!
So doing that kind
of exercises effectively lowers small particle LDL.
Taking a few
hundred mg a day of niacin tests as likely lowering small particle LDL. I’ve not seen research that directly tests
this. But the research that does exist
virtually proves that niacin does this.
Researchers at
Harvard found that a very accurate and inexpensive way to test for small
particle LDL is the ratio of HDL to triglycerides in an inexpensive and
standard lipid panel test.
If the amount of
HDL is far higher than the triglycerides, the small particle LDL is low. However, in most people today the level of
triglycerides is many times as high as the level of their HDL. These people need far more than just lowering
of all their LDL although it would help some.
Taking niacin
without too much flushing is doable and I’ll not cover that here. But taking it does increase HDL and lower
triglycerides and shows the expected lowering of LDL too. Taking it also lowers the death rate for
people who take it from all causes.
New information on
what to STOP doing to lower small particle LDL:
Eating high fructose corn syrup, foods made with refined grains, and
eating excessive amounts of real sugar and drinking soft drinks lowers HDL and
dramatically boosts triglyceride levels.
Stopping these
things also is an enormous help with fat loss and preventing type 2 diabetes of
course, but those two readings effects
virtually proves it also causes a sharp increase in small particle LDL.
Do all those things
to do and not do and taking statins becomes unnecessary. Avoid doing them all makes taking statins a
totally ineffective effort.
Think tossing a
glass of water onto a forest fire!
b) But that’s not all the reason why lowering
high LDL readings is desirable. Normally
the large particle LDL is safe because it rolls like a tumbleweed along your
blood vessel walls.
But what if you
added metal spike to each particle of it?
High blood sugar
was recently found to do just that!
Eating high
fructose corn syrup, foods made with refined grains, and eating excessive
amounts of real sugar and drinking soft drinks AND not doing either vigorous or
moderate exercise at all causes insulin resistance and spikes of quite high
blood sugar and then excessively high levels of blood sugar all the time.
The recent research
has found that even lower levels of such high blood sugar has this effect
because the excess sugar gets stuck to each particle of LDL and harms the inner
surface of your blood vessels and capillaries much like adding metal spikes or
tiny knives to each particle of LDL – including the bigger particles that would
be safe otherwise.
That’s apparently
how type 2 diabetes cause extra heart attacks, foot amputation, ED, blindness,
several kinds of dementia and more.
Because this makes
ALL your LDL harmful, people with high blood sugar would be benefitted by
lowering all their LDL.
But note that
reversing the two major causes of the high blood sugar is the priority
choice. Ten times the effort should be
spent on reversing the cause of the condition!
(Research shows
that people taking statins become MORE likely to have high blood sugar besides
not being very effective against heart disease.
So using statins to lower LDL is a dramatically poor choice for such people.)
That said, are
there 3 effective and safe ways to lower all LDL without using statins.
People who eat
foods high in soluble fiber find their total LDL goes down. Beans, apples, applesauce, nuts for those not
allergic, and moderate amounts of rolled oats or steel cut oats each helps do
this. And most nonstarchy vegetables
contain some soluble fiber as well.
(People who eat a
lot of such foods also find they are less fat without being hungrier.
And this is one
excellent answer to what to eat instead of the foods high in excess sugar and
hydrogenated oils.)
Second most of
these same foods are high in sterols which also lower LDL cholesterol.
Third and even
better, you not only can take sterols directly as a supplement, doing so has
been shown effective in lowering LDL cholesterol. (I take Natrol “Cholesterol Balance” which is
their beta sitosterol sterol supplement. It’s remarkably inexpensive as
supplements go besides.)
Meanwhile most
doctors still seem to know none of this.
They have heard that statins lower LDL and lower heart attack risk
somewhat. Since so far, that’s all they
know!
So they prescribe
statins despite all of the above suggesting that’s the LAST thing to do because
of the side effects, ineffectiveness, and NOT using the actions that are
actually preventive.
One doctor in his
article I read on MedScape even is so oversold on statins that he only gives up
on giving statins if his patients can’t stand ANY of the FIVE kinds of statins
he prescribes and has them try!
Could this dreadful
situation be worse?
It is indeed much
worse in fact!
The Berkeley Heart
Lab did research that was once available on their website showing that for most
people taking statins offered little if any heart attack protection.
They did find there
is a minority of people who have a certain heredity and genetic type for
whom statins are actually protective
enough to consider as a last resort medication.
Cardiologist Dr
Arthur Agatson said in an article I read that the test for that genetic pattern
only costs $150.
I’ve virtually
never heard of a doctor knowing to order that test BEFORE prescribing statins.
Yet this current
situation borders on malpractice and adds millions of wasted dollars to our too
high health care costs each and every year.
That means if your
doctor finds you have LDL cholesterol of 130 or more or if you have high blood
sugar an LDL reading of over 100 and says you should take action to lower it.
THAT is completely accurate.
If they prescribe a
statin without getting this genetic test first and educating you on all the
subjects in this post, it’s not only safe to ignore that advice. It’s likely unsafe to take it!
The facts now known
essentially prove that advice incorrect and unsound!
3 Comments:
Is it true that statins are bad for diabetic persons? I've read lots of negative articles about statins and I really want to know more about it. I think my aunt doctor prescribe it to her that's why I need to know how good it is to her health.
To the extent that I know the facts, the answer is in this post.
For most people with type 2 diabetes, statins are likely to be harmful compared with using the other methods in this post which are more effective and safer and do NOT tend to make her diabetes a bit worse -- IF your aunt fits in that group.
For most people and most diabetics, statins ARE a bad idea.
In my view, the vast majority of people now taking statins should not be -- nor are they as much safer as they, and too often their doctors, think they are.
BUT there are exceptions where statins would be a good idea.
Statins CAN be a better idea for some diabetics.
Here's some of those possibilities.:
If your aunt was unable or unwilling to do the lifestyle upgrades and also tested to be in the genetic group that statins actually benefit and her LDL was way over 160 & her HBA1C was well over 7.0 however, for HER, statins actually might be a good idea.
Managing type 1 diabetes too is a bit different.Because they cannot exercise as well or change things as much with eating better and must use insulin, their ability to improve things with exercise and food upgrades is more limited, they may need more aggressive LDL management. And again IF they test as benefiting from statins in the genetic test and have LDL well above 160 and didn't do well on niacin, in such a case, statins might make sense.
So, the first thing to find out is,
Has your Aunt's doctor tested her with the $150 or so genetic test to see if she is in the group who benefits from taking statins?
Is she willing to do a really thorough job to upgrade what she eats and stop eating the things that cause high blood sugar and heart attacks and strokes -- AND do regular exercise?
Does she have type 1 or 2 diabetes?
It depends in your aunt's case on some of the things. So to know for your aunt, these are the things her doctor should look at.
It's her health and she has to decide.
Has her doctor raised these issues or run the test to see if she is in the group that statins actually benefit? Did he or she try her on niacin first? Is her doctor willing to discuss things with her and listen to her concerns?
If her doctor has not done or won't do these things, your aunt may need to look for a better doctor.
There ARE good doctors out there!
Don't yet use Twitter or have a Facebook page for health and fat loss. (That will come later. For now, I need that time for my job and writing the posts._
Meanwhile, you can email me at davideller7@yahoo.com of you'd like my weekly email for summaries of my previous week's post. I am already doing that.
Post a Comment
<< Home